Amazon advertising services are booming – but how do you price them fairly? Should you charge a fixed monthly fee, a percentage of ad spend or sales, or a hybrid?
In this blog, we’ll break down the pros, cons, and use-cases for each pricing model to help brands choose the right agency structure and help agencies price their services profitably and transparently.
You charge or pay a flat monthly fee (e.g., $500/month) regardless of ad spend or sales.
Best for:
Smaller brands with consistent ad budgets
Agencies with systemized SOPs
Predictable workload and deliverables
Pros:
Simple billing
No surprises for clients
Easier for accounting and budgeting
Cons:
No upside incentive for agencies
Not scalable if workload increases
Brands may underpay or overpay based on actual results
You charge a percentage of the client’s ad spend (usually 10%–20%).
Example: $10,000 monthly ad spend → $1,500 fee at 15%
Best for:
Medium to large brands
Clients scaling aggressively
Agencies providing active bid & campaign management
Pros:
Scales with ad budget
Motivates agencies to push spend (and performance)
Transparent for brands spending more
Cons:
Doesn’t guarantee return (may reward inefficient spend)
Harder for clients with fluctuating budgets
Risk of mistrust if ROAS drops
You charge based on a percentage of sales generated (e.g., 3% of GMV).
Best for:
Full-funnel performance partnerships
D2C or Amazon brands with strong attribution
Agencies running both ads + listing + CRO
Pros:
True performance model
Risk-sharing motivates better performance
Aligned incentives
Cons:
Attribution disputes (especially with external traffic)
Reporting can get messy
May exclude brand-building or long-term value
Combines fixed base fee + performance bonus:
Example: $750/month + 5% of revenue above $30K
Best for:
Mature clients scaling with agency support
Balancing baseline operations + performance upside
Pros:
Security for agency
Motivation for overperformance
Works well for long-term retainers
Cons:
Needs transparent reporting
May require contracts or revenue validation
Factor | Considerations |
---|---|
Monthly Revenue | <$15K = fixed, $15K–$50K = % spend, >$50K = hybrid |
Ad Spend | < $3K = fixed; >$5K = % makes more sense |
Number of SKUs | More SKUs = more workload → higher fees |
Tools Used | Advanced dashboards, automation = premium |
Client Type | Startup? Brand? Marketplace seller? |
Risk Level | Who handles creatives, listings, backend? |
Client Type | Revenue | Ad Spend | Model | Fee Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
New Amazon Seller | $8K/mo | $1.5K | Fixed | $500/month |
D2C Brand Scaling | $35K/mo | $7K | % of Ad Spend | 15% = $1,050 |
Established Brand | $75K/mo | $12K | Hybrid (Fixed + %) | $1,000 + 3% > $50K GMV |
Agency with Tool Use | $50K/mo | $10K | % of Ad Spend + Tool Fee | 12% + $200 dashboard |
At eCommercean, we follow a scalable hybrid model:
First 3 months: Fixed, transparent onboarding price (covers setup, analytics, tools)
Post onboarding: Either
a) Flat retainer
b) Percentage of GMV
We choose whichever is higher – aligning with both growth and stability.
This ensures we scale with the client, but don’t operate at a loss when volume is low.
If you’re a brand:
Ask for performance metrics (not just spend reports)
Demand clear attribution logic (Amazon Attribution, SQR, etc.)
Start with fixed, then move to hybrid once trust is built
If you’re an agency:
Offer ROI-based dashboards
Use SOPs and automation to scale fixed-price clients profitably
Offer audits or tool-based insights to upsell retainers
There’s no one-size-fits-all model – but transparency, scalability, and alignment are non-negotiable. Fixed pricing gives stability, percentage rewards performance, and hybrids strike the perfect balance.
Want to work with an agency that adapts to your brand’s growth? Explore eCommercean’s Growth-Ready Pricing Models and book a discovery call today.